sham debate with milk foam
Left Party leader Gesine Lötzsch and DIW economist Karl Brenke discuss about "skill shortages"
By Jörn Boewe, young world, 1 Feb. 2011
If a company, the other "companies in socially acceptable and responsible conduct of job cuts," supported plans to organize a "labor market debate" with the Left Party leader Gesine Lötzsch and the total metal's chief economist, Michael Steel, which could perhaps be interesting to werden.Wird not. You sense it when you read the title: "shortage of skilled workers - Drama or opportunity," party chairman Lötzsch expressed, as we know, wants to have some rather arcane issues.
After all, the atmosphere fits. Monday morning, at Café Einstein, 42 Unter den Linden Here, where capital journalists Ministerialbürokraten and replace Bundestagshinterbänklern rumors, one is happy if the intellectual level of the conversation somehow by strumming the latte macchiato cups apart.
Lord Steel of total metal is unable to attend. For him, jumps Karl Brenke the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) that is formally independent, financially semi-public and political will is rather unternehmernah. In this respect, also fits this
will moderate the whole of the former Max chief editor Peter Craven, normally including the former image-editor Hans-Hermann Tiedje N24 at the talk show "left-right" makes.
"The skills shortage," Schumacher opened the debate, "the billows that for years through the area." That was perhaps the wrong word, because now it wafts the next hour completely on unchecked. Gesine Lötzsch points out that it had succeeded in the past two decades many south German companies to bridge their skills shortages through immigration from the accession of territory ". Moreover, they will have defined the term expert is not so tight. "You have the competence for the task have," is the point. Many talents were wasted in the society also Lötzsch know from their "daily work report as Members' z.B. die von Spätaussiedlern aus der ehemaligen Sowjetunion (»im Volksmund Rußlanddeutsche genannt«). Obwohl viele von ihnen »hohe Qualifikationen« hätten, »können sie in ihren Berufen nicht arbeiten«, weiß die Linke-Chefin. Und berichtet vom haarsträubenden Fall eines tschetschenischen Chirurgen, der in Senftenberg praktiziert (»er darf nur in Senftenberg arbeiten«), während seine Familie in Berlin wohnt und ihn nicht besuchen darf. »In Senftenberg?«, fragt Schumacher. »Was hat der Mann verbrochen?« Aber das will Gesine Lötzsch jetzt nicht vertiefen, es war nur ein Beispiel.
Jetzt Brenke. Im Gegensatz zur Politikerin formuliert der Wissenschaftler seine Theses rather harmless. That she is not even notice that people are only after he has repeated it four or five times. "There is almost no occupation in Germany, where I find no workers," he says. No reaction. "We now employ mechanical engineers still less than before the crisis." Still nothing. "We do not have a skills shortage," Ah, yes, but let's talk about it -. So there will surely be a problem or not? The are "complaints about the alleged skills shortage" politically motivated ", clarifies Brenke: no coincidence that they were connected" with the call for more immigration ' und also eine Debatte, fingiert mit dem Ziel, die Löhne »in einem bestimmten Segment« zu senken, sagt der Mann vom DIW.
Was sagt die Linke? Die Linkspartei hat ein starkes Bedürfnis, ihre Seriosität zu beweisen. Das macht man in der Berliner Republik, z.B., indem man konstruktiv mit dem politischen Gegenüber über ein Problem diskutiert, das es gar nicht gibt. Jugendliche bräuchten mehr Berufspraktika während der Schulzeit, sagt Lötzsch, was gewiß nicht falsch ist. Qualifiziertere Berater in den Arbeitsagenturen wären auch nicht schlecht. Es kommt kein Dampf in die Debatte. Dampf kommt hier nur aus der Espressomaschine, es wabert noch ein Weilchen mit der Konsistenz von lauwarmer Luft, dann is the end. Gesine Lötzsch must go to the next appointment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment